Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187133›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Repeat thyroid FNAC: Inter-observer agreement among high- and low-volume centers in Naples metropolitan area and correlation with the EU-TIRADS.

Lorenzo Scappaticcio, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Sergio Iorio, Maria Ida Maiorino, Miriam Longo, Laura Croce, Marcello Filograna Pignatelli, Sonia Ferrandes, Immacolata Cozzolino, Marco Montella and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lorenzo ScappaticcioDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Pierpaolo TrimboliClinic for Endocrinology and Diabetology, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Sergio IorioDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Maria Ida MaiorinoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Miriam LongoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Laura CroceIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Pavia, Italy.
Marcello Filograna PignatelliDivision of Thyroid Surgery, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Sonia FerrandesDivision of Thyroid Surgery, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Immacolata CozzolinoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marco MontellaPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Andrea RonchiPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Renato FrancoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mario RotondiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni DocimoDivision of Thyroid Surgery, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Katherine EspositoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BellastellaDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our institution (University Hospital "L. Vanvitelli" - Naples, Italy) is a high-volume (HV) center in Naples metropolitan area and many patients are referred there to repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) after initial FNAC performed in low-volume institutions (LV). The aims of the study were to 1) examine the inter-observer agreement between HV and LV institutions according to the Italian thyroid cytology system, and 2) explore how the discordant FNAC reports were distributed in the European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System (EU-TIRADS) categories. All consecutive cases of repeat FNAC performed at University Hospital "L. Vanvitelli" from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Fleiss' kappa (κ) was used to assess the inter-observer agreement, and categorical variables were compared by chi-square testing. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 124 nodules from 124 adults (mean age 49 years; mean maximum diameter 19 mm) were evaluated. Initial FNAC reports at LV were: 4 (3.2%) TIR1c, 64 (51.6%) TIR2, 48 (38.7%) TIR3A, 8 (6.5%) TIR3B, 0 TIR4, 0 TIR5. The overall FNAC reports were significantly different between the LV and HV institutions. At repeated FNAC, cytological diagnosis was unchanged in 64 (51.6%) cases including TIR2 and TIR3A results. A downgraded FNAC diagnosis (i.e., TIR2 vs TIR3A, TIR2 vs TIR3B) was observed in 36 (29%) nodules. An upgraded FNAC diagnosis (i.e., TIR3B vs TIR2, TIR3B vs TIR3A, TIR4 vs TIR3A, TIR5 vs TIR2, TIR5 vs TIR3B) was recorded in 24 (19.4%) nodules. The weighted inter-observer agreement between LV and HV institutions was poor (κ=0.133). Changed FNAC results were significantly (p=0.0023) more frequent in nodules at intermediate/high-risk (i.e., EU-TIRADS 4/5) than in those at no/low risk (EU-TIRADS 2/3) [i.e., 32/48 (66.7%) and 28/76 (36.8%), respectively]. Downgraded FNAC results were significantly more frequent in EU-TIRADS 2/3 (p=0.001) while upgraded FNAC were present only in EU-TIRADS 4/5 (24/24, 100.0%). The inter-observer agreement among LV and HV thyroid services was poor. The EU-TIRADS 4 and 5 categories included all the malignant nodules with FNAC results reclassified as higher risk (i.e., TIR3B-TIR4-TIR5) by the high-volume cytology service.

Indexed as

Thyroid NoduleAdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansMiddle AgedObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesEU-TIRADSICCRTCneck ultrasoundthyroid FNACthyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID36187133
PMCPMC9519850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.