Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187082›Full record

ReviewSleep medicine: X2022

Disorders of Arousal and timing of the first period of slow wave sleep: Clinical and forensic implications.

Mark R Pressman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep medicine: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark R PressmanPressman Sleep and Science Forensics, LLC, Ardmore, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing of first period of slow wave sleep (SWS) is often used as a proxy for determining if and when Disorders of Arousal (DOA) such as sleepwalking are likely to occur or did occur in the past. In criminal cases employing a "sleepwalking defense" the prosecution may argue that nocturnal violence or sexually aggressive behavior occurred too early in the sleep period to be associated with SWS. Expert witness opinion on the expected latency to SWS (LSWS) has varied from minutes after sleep onset to ≥60 min. A search of PubMed was conducted for LSWS and for any reports of DOAs occurring from stage N2. A total of 21 studies reported LSWS in normal controls, clinically diagnosed sleepwalkers, in otherwise normal sleepers following different types of sleep deprivation and due to the effects of alcohol. Five studies reported episodes of DOA from N2 sleep. The shortest mean LSWS of 6.4 min was found with a combination of total sleep deprivation and alcohol. In a group of normal research subjects, a LSWS mean of 10.7 min was noted. LSWS in DOA patients occurred as early as a mean of 12.4 min. Two sleep studies performed on Kenneth Parks, acquitted of the murder of his mother-in-law by a sleepwalking defense, reported LSWSs of 9.7 and 10 min. Sleep deprivation but not alcohol was found to decrease LSWS significantly. Expert opinions on LSWS should be based on scientific peer reviewed publications documenting empirical sleep evidence and can be much shorter than is generally reported.

Indexed as

AlcoholDisorder of arousalDOA, Disorder of ArousalForensic evaluationKenneth parksLatency to slow wave sleepLSWS, Latency to Slow Wave SleepN3NREM, Non-Rapid Eye Movement SleepSexual behavior in sleepSleep deprivationSleepwalking defenseSleepwalking violenceSlow wave sleepSWS, Slow Wave Sleep

Identifiers

PMID36187082
PMCPMC9520070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.