Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187057›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2022

Increased quality of bowel preparation via smartphone WeChat application: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Jing Wen, Jia Feng, Cuihua Liu, Dianhui Yang, Yangyang Zhang, Nali Lu, Jianmei Yu, Yanxin Gao, Ruli Sheng, Jianhua Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An abdominal vibration combined with walking exercise (AVCWE) program for older patients with constipation: Development and feasibility study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing WenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 984 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shangzhuang Township Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Jia FengDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 980 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Cuihua LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 984 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shangzhuang Township Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Dianhui YangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 984 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shangzhuang Township Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yangyang ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, 988 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Nali LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, 988 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jianmei YuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 980 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yanxin GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 984 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shangzhuang Township Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Ruli ShengDepartment of Gastroenterology, 988 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jianhua WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 980 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jin HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, 988 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: High-quality bowel preparation is an essential precondition for colonoscopy. Few studies have evaluated the smartphone WeChat application as a means of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Aim: To assess the effect of patient education by using smartphone WeChat application aids on the quality of bowel preparation. Material and methods: A multicenter prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled study was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups. A total of 478 patents in groups A were accepted for smartphone WeChat application, 477 in groups B were accepted for conventional education plus smartphone WeChat application while group C (473 patients) was a control group. The primary outcome was the quality of the bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate, insertion and withdrawal time, anxiety score, self-rated sleep quality, and willingness to undergo another colonoscopy. Results: Total BBPS score was significantly higher in groups B and C than in the control group (7.5 ±1.2, 7.5 ±1.3 vs. 6.5 ±1.2, p < 0.001). PDR in group A (40.2%, 192/478) and group B (41.7%, 199/477) was higher than that in the control group (p = 0.003) and mean number of polyps per patient was higher too (p = 0.015). Moreover, a shorter cecal insertion time was recorded in group A and group B than in the control group (8.8 ±3.9, 8.9 ±3.8 vs. 10.5 ±4.2 min, p < 0.001). Intervention groups showed lower anxiety scores and better quality sleep and were more likely to be willing to repeat colonoscopy. Conclusions: Patient instruction via smartphone WeChat application efficiently improved bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Indexed as

bowel preparationcolonoscopypolyp detection ratesmartphone application

Identifiers

PMID36187057
PMCPMC9511908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.