Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187056›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2022

Intracorporeal reinforcing sutures reduce anastomotic leakage in double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Hiroki Hashida, Ryosuke Mizuno, Kentaro Iwaki, Yusuke Hanabata, Ryosuke Kita, Nobu Oshima, Koji Kitamura, Masato Kondo, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kenji Uryuhara and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiroki HashidaDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Ryosuke MizunoDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kentaro IwakiDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Yusuke HanabataDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Ryosuke KitaDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Nobu OshimaDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Koji KitamuraDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Masato KondoDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Hiroyuki KobayashiDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kenji UryuharaDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Satoshi KaiharaDepartment of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In rectal surgery, double-stapled anastomosis is one of the most common techniques. However, the crossing of the staple line is considered a weakness of this method and could lead to anastomotic leakage (AL), which is one of the major complications of rectal cancer surgery. Aim: To investigate the usefulness of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcement suturing for preventing AL in laparoscopic rectal surgery. Material and methods: A total of 153 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic rectal resection with anastomosis using the double-stapling technique between January 2015 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcomes were recorded and retrospectively analysed. Patients who received intracorporeal reinforcing sutures (n = 72) were compared with those who did not receive the reinforcing sutures (n = 81). Results: AL was observed in 11 (7.2%) cases overall and in only 1 case in the group with intracorporeal reinforcing sutures. There were no associations between clinicopathological factors and the use of reinforcing sutures. Multivariate analysis revealed that a distance from the anal verge of less than 6.5 cm, diabetes mellitus, and the non-use of reinforcing sutures were independent risk factors for AL. Conclusions: Laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures reduced the incidence of AL. Therefore, laparoscopic reinforcing sutures for double-stapled anastomoses seem useful for the prevention of AL.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakagedouble-staplinglaparoscopic surgeryrectal cancerreinforcing suture

Identifiers

PMID36187056
PMCPMC9511922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.