Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186991›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Yan-Yan Li, Hui Wang, Yang-Yang Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan-Yan LiClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yang-Yang ZhangDepartment of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Methods and results: The association between them was evaluated by calculating the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The random-effects models were used because of the significant heterogeneity among them. In this meta-analysis, 8,488 subjects from 9 studies were included. The Conclusion:

Indexed as

coronary artery diseasegeneticmacrophage migration inhibitory factorMIFpolymorphismrs755622

Identifiers

PMID36186991
PMCPMC9515403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.