ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Machine learning-based prediction of the post-thrombotic syndrome: Model development and validation study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06183944 (Data Clustering Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients Who Presented With Acute Pulmonary Embolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Data Clustering Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients Who Presented With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multi-omics and machine learning identify an interaction between SLC39A11 and phosphoinositide metabolism in deep vein thrombosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Deep vein thrombosis as a public health priority: wHO's agenda for Africa 2030.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Unsupervised and supervised machine learning to identify variability of tumor-educated platelets and association with pan-cancer: A cross-national study.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model for predicting recanalization in isolated distal deep vein thrombosis and analysis of predictors.PloS one · 2026Article
- Integration of bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq reveals transcriptomic signatures associated with deep vein thrombosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of expression of genes associated with post-thrombotic syndrome.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2025Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for the occurrence of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after laparoscopic surgery in abdominal surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of early prediction of post-thrombotic syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prevention is highly involved in reducing the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We aimed to develop accurate models with machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict whether PTS would occur within 24 months. Materials and methods: The clinical data used for model building were obtained from the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis study and the external validation cohort was acquired from the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital in China. The main outcome was defined as the occurrence of PTS events (Villalta score ≥5). Twenty-three clinical variables were included, and four ML algorithms were applied to build the models. For discrimination and calibration, F scores were used to evaluate the prediction ability of the models. The external validation cohort was divided into ten groups based on the risk estimate deciles to identify the hazard threshold. Results: In total, 555 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were included to build models using ML algorithms, and the models were further validated in a Chinese cohort comprising 117 patients. When predicting PTS within 2 years after acute DVT, logistic regression based on gradient descent and L1 regularization got the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI:0.76-0.89) in external validation. When considering model performance in both the derivation and external validation cohorts, the eXtreme gradient boosting and gradient boosting decision tree models had similar results and presented better stability and generalization. The external validation cohort was divided into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with the prediction probability of 0.3 and 0.4 as critical points. Conclusion: Machine learning models built for PTS had accurate prediction ability and stable generalization, which can further facilitate clinical decision-making, with potentially important implications for selecting patients who will benefit from endovascular surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.