Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Machine learning-based prediction of the post-thrombotic syndrome: Model development and validation study.

Tao Yu, Runnan Shen, Guochang You, Lin Lv, Shimao Kang, Xiaoyan Wang, Jiatang Xu, Dongxi Zhu, Zuqi Xia, Junmeng Zheng and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06183944 (Data Clustering Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients Who Presented With Acute Pulmonary Embolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06183944 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Data Clustering Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients Who Presented With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur MerRan2023 to 2026Enrolled2,350ConditionsPulmonary EmbolismArmsHierarchical clustering methods
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tao YuDepartment of Emergency, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Runnan ShenZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guochang YouZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin LvZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shimao KangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan WangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiatang XuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dongxi ZhuZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zuqi XiaZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Junmeng ZhengZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kai HuangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prevention is highly involved in reducing the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We aimed to develop accurate models with machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict whether PTS would occur within 24 months. Materials and methods: The clinical data used for model building were obtained from the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis study and the external validation cohort was acquired from the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital in China. The main outcome was defined as the occurrence of PTS events (Villalta score ≥5). Twenty-three clinical variables were included, and four ML algorithms were applied to build the models. For discrimination and calibration, F scores were used to evaluate the prediction ability of the models. The external validation cohort was divided into ten groups based on the risk estimate deciles to identify the hazard threshold. Results: In total, 555 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were included to build models using ML algorithms, and the models were further validated in a Chinese cohort comprising 117 patients. When predicting PTS within 2 years after acute DVT, logistic regression based on gradient descent and L1 regularization got the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI:0.76-0.89) in external validation. When considering model performance in both the derivation and external validation cohorts, the eXtreme gradient boosting and gradient boosting decision tree models had similar results and presented better stability and generalization. The external validation cohort was divided into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with the prediction probability of 0.3 and 0.4 as critical points. Conclusion: Machine learning models built for PTS had accurate prediction ability and stable generalization, which can further facilitate clinical decision-making, with potentially important implications for selecting patients who will benefit from endovascular surgery.

Indexed as

deep vein thrombosisendovascularmachine learningpost-thrombotic syndromeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36186967
PMCPMC9523080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.