ArticleOphthalmology science2021
Comparing Retinal Structure in Patients with Achromatopsia and Blue Cone Monochromacy Using OCT.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monogenic Retinal Diseases Associated With Genes Encoding Phototransduction Proteins: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Review
- Blue cone monochromacy and gene therapy.Vision research · 2023Review
- Challenges Associated With Ellipsoid Zone Intensity Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To compare foveal hypoplasia and the appearance of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) at the fovea in patients with genetically confirmed achromatopsia (ACHM) and blue cone monochromacy (BCM). Design: Retrospective, multi-center observational study. Subjects: Molecularly confirmed patients with ACHM (n = 89) and BCM (n = 33). Methods: We analyzed high-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images of the macula from aforementioned patients with BCM. Three observers independently graded SD-OCT images for foveal hypoplasia (i.e. retention of one or more inner retinal layers at the fovea) and four observers judged the integrity of the EZ at the fovea, based on an established grading scheme. These measures were compared with previously published data from the ACHM patients. Main Outcome Measures: Presence of foveal hypoplasia and EZ grade. Results: Foveal hypoplasia was significantly more prevalent in ACHM than in BCM (p<0.001). In addition, we observed a significant difference in the distribution of EZ grades between ACHM and BCM, with grade II EZ being by far the most common phenotype in BCM (61% of patients). In contrast, ACHM patients had a relatively equal prevalence of EZ grades I, II, and IV. Interestingly, grade IV EZ was 2.6 times more prevalent in ACHM compared to BCM, while grade V EZ (macular atrophy) was present in 3% of both the ACHM and BCM cohorts. Conclusions: The higher incidence of foveal hypoplasia in ACHM than BCM supports a role for cone activity in foveal development. Although there are differences in EZ grades between these conditions, the degree of overlap suggests EZ grade is not sufficient for definitive diagnosis, in contrast to previous reports. Analysis of additional OCT features in similar cohorts may reveal differences with greater diagnostic value. Finally, the extent to which foveal hypoplasia or EZ grade is prognostic for therapeutic potential in either group remains to be seen, but motivates further study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.