Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186850›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Mapping the structure of depression biomarker research: A bibliometric analysis.

Xiang-Jie Guo, Peng Wu, Xiao Jia, Yi-Ming Dong, Chun-Mei Zhao, Nian-Nian Chen, Zhi-Yong Zhang, Yu-Ting Miao, Ke-Ming Yun, Cai-Rong Gao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiang-Jie GuoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiao JiaCollege of Pharmacy, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yi-Ming DongDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Chun-Mei ZhaoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Nian-Nian ChenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Zhi-Yong ZhangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yu-Ting MiaoDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Ke-Ming YunDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Cai-Rong GaoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yan RenDepartment of Psychiatry, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is a common mental disorder and the diagnosis is still based on the descriptions of symptoms. Biomarkers can reveal disease characteristics for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. In recent years, many biomarkers relevant to the mechanisms of depression have been identified. This study uses bibliometric methods and visualization tools to analyse the literature on depression biomarkers and its hot topics, and research frontiers to provide references for future research. Methods: Scientific publications related to depression biomarkers published between 2009 and 2022 were obtained from the Web of Science database. The BICOMB software was used to extract high-frequency keywords and to construct binary word-document and co-word matrices. gCLUTO was used for bicluster and visual analyses of high-frequency keywords. Further graphical visualizations were generated using R, CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. Results: A total of 14,403 articles related to depression biomarkers were identified. The United States (34.81%) and China (15.68%), which together account for more than half of all publications, can be considered the research base for the field. Among institutions, the University of California, University of London, and Harvard University are among the top in terms of publication number. Three authors (Maes M, Penninx B.W.J.H., and Berk M) emerged as eminent researchers in the field. Finally, eight research hotspots for depression biomarkers were identified using reference co-citation analysis. Conclusion: This study used bibliometric methods to characterize the body of literature and subject knowledge in the field of depression biomarker research. Among the core biomarkers of depression, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), cytokines, and oxidative stress are relatively well established; however, research on machine learning, metabolomics, and microRNAs holds potential for future development. We found "microRNAs" and "gut microbiota" to be the most recent burst terms in the study of depression biomarkers and the likely frontiers of future research.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisbiomarkerco-citation analysisco-word analysisdepression

Identifiers

PMID36186850
PMCPMC9523516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.