Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186826›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

At the limits of digital education. The importance of practical education for clinical competencies learning in the field of emergency medicine: A controlled non-randomized interventional study.

Lina Vogt, Michael Schauwinhold, Rolf Rossaint, Henning Schenkat, Martin Klasen, Saša Sopka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Absenteeism on Student's Performance in Different Components of Examinations - A Comparison of Online Verses Offline Teaching.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina VogtClinic for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Michael SchauwinholdClinic for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Rolf RossaintClinic for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Henning SchenkatDean of Students Office, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Martin KlasenClinic for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Saša SopkaClinic for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A high-quality education of future physicians is essential. Modern approaches interlock the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in a spiral curriculum, leading to a mutual learning benefit for knowledge and application. This model was challenged by the elimination of hands-on trainings during the pandemic, which were often replaced by purely digital teaching models. Given the holistic nature of the spiral curriculum, we assumed that a purely digital model would have an impact on knowledge acquisition due to missing hands-on learning opportunities. The aim of the study was to investigate, using an emergency seminar as an example, whether purely digital training leads to a difference in theoretical knowledge compared to the traditional model. Materials and methods: Study design: We used a two-groups design comparing a sample of medical students taught in 2020 with a purely digital teaching format (DF; Results: Students in the DF group scored significantly lower than students in the TF group in the final exams. Students in the DF group rated the course significantly worse than students in the TF group. Discussion: The study results illustrate that purely digital education leads to inferior knowledge acquisition compared to the traditional spiral curriculum. A possible explanation may lie in a deeper processing of the information (e.g., understanding the information by experience and analysis) and accordingly a better memory recall. Moreover, the students' critical appraisal of the DF may have had an unfavorable effect on learning performance. Moderating factors may be lower learning motivation or the "zoom fatigue" effect. Conclusion: These study results clearly illustrate the importance of hands-on teaching for knowledge acquisition. The interlocking of theoretical knowledge and practical skills, as ensured by the spiral curriculum, is essential.

Indexed as

clinical competencycompetency-based medical education (CBME)digital educationemergency medicine (MeSH database)medical educationpractical skill

Identifiers

PMID36186826
PMCPMC9523109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.