ArticleJournal of pain research2022
Migration of Epidural Leads During Spinal Cord Stimulator Trials.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- STIMFIX™ anchoring in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation trials: interim analysis of a multicenter study.Pain management · 2025Trial
- Article
- Therapy-specific motoneuron activation with epidural and dorsal root ganglion stimulation in spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Objective, Same-Day SCS Trials with ECAP-Controlled Closed-Loop Therapy: Depth of Response is Maintained from Trial to 12 months.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Perspective/short review: Adverse events associated with placement of spinal cord stimulators (SCS).Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Stimulation: Mechanisms of Action, Indications, Types, Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Lead migration and postdural puncture headache following spinal cord stimulator placement in patient with cough: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025Article
- Retrograde evoked compound action potentials as an alternative for close-loop spinal cord stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identifying SCS Trial Responders Immediately After Postoperative Programming with ECAP Dose-Controlled Closed-Loop Therapy.Pain and therapy · 2024Article
- Early epidural lead migration in spinal cord stimulator trials: A case series.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
- Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulators-A Comprehensive Review Article.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Creating Realistic Definitions of Clinically Significant Radiographic Lead Migration - A Response to "Migration of Epidural Leads During Spinal Cord Stimulator Trials" [Response to Letter].Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Creating Realistic Definitions of Clinically Significant Radiographic Lead Migration - A Response to "Migration of Epidural Leads During Spinal Cord Stimulator Trials" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Lead migration is the most commonly reported complication of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) procedures and lead migration during trials of SCS can compromise both the success of the trial as well as the efficacy of subsequent implantation. Our objective was to examine the incidence and degree of intra-trial SCS lead migration and our hypothesis was that there would be a higher rate of significant radiographic lead migration during SCS trial than what has been previously published for permanently implanted leads. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed the radiographic location of SCS leads on final fluoroscopic imaging at the time of trial lead placement compared to thoracic radiographs obtained at the end of the SCS trial to quantify the rate and degree of migration during the trial. Thirty-five patients were included in the study with 69 leads assessed for radiographic degree of migration. The majority of patients were trialed utilizing paresthesia-free systems (57%) and the most common indication was for post-laminectomy syndrome (57%). Results: In our series of 35 patients, on average there was 28 mm or 1.17 vertebral body levels of migration. No statistically significant correlation was found between fixation technique, physician experience, device manufacturer, patient age, sex, height or BMI and likelihood of significant radiographic migration. Conclusion: In our study, lead migration appears to be a more significant occurrence during SCS trial than previously reported. Intra-trial migration presents a significant challenge for clinical care and examination of risk factors for migration and techniques for prevention are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.