Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186722›Full record

ArticleMindfulness2022

Mindfulness-based school interventions: A systematic review of outcome evidence quality by study design.

Mary L Phan, Tyler L Renshaw, Julie Caramanico, Jeffrey M Greeson, Elizabeth MacKenzie, Zabryna Atkinson-Diaz, Natalie Doppelt, Hungtzu Tai, David S Mandell, Heather J Nuske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mindfulness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mary L PhanDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, USA.
Tyler L RenshawDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, USA.
Julie CaramanicoPenn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jeffrey M GreesonDepartment of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, USA.
Elizabeth MacKenzieGraduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Zabryna Atkinson-DiazPenn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Natalie DoppeltPenn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Hungtzu TaiSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David S MandellPenn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Heather J NuskePenn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

Reducing Challenging Behaviors In Children With Autism Through Digital HealthK01MH120509 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI NUSKE, HEATHER J · 2020 to 2024
$773k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH120509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the current literature on mindfulness-based school interventions (MBSIs) by evaluating evidence across specific outcomes for youth. Methods: We evaluated 77 studies with a total sample of 12,358 students across five continents, assessing the quality of each study through a robust coding system for evidence-based guidelines. Coders rated each study numerically per study design as 1++ (RCT with a very low risk of bias) to 4 (expert opinion) and across studies for the corresponding evidence letter grade, from highest quality ('A Grade') to lowest quality ('D Grade') evidence. Results: The highest quality evidence ('A Grade') across outcomes indicated that MBSIs increased prosocial behavior, resilience, executive function, attention and mindfulness, and decreased anxiety, attention problems/ADHD behaviors and conduct behaviors. The highest quality evidence for well-being was split, with some studies showing increased well-being and some showing no improvements. The highest quality evidence suggests MBSIs have a null effect on depression symptoms. Conclusion: This review demonstrates the promise of incorporating mindfulness interventions in school settings for improving certain youth outcomes. We urge researchers interested in MBSIs to study their effectiveness using more rigorous designs (e.g., RCTs with active control groups, multi-method outcome assessment, and follow-up evaluation), to minimize bias and promote higher quality-not just increased quantity-evidence that can be relied upon to guide school-based practice.

Indexed as

evidence-based practicemindfulnessschool-based interventionsschool mental healthsystematic reviewyouth

Identifiers

PMID36186722
PMCPMC9524483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.