ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Prediction for late-onset sepsis in preterm infants based on data from East China.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial and fungal infections in infants born before 24 weeks' gestation: a review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Late-Preterm and Early-Term Respiratory Morbidity in Infants Born Primarily via Elective Caesarean Section.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial peptide LL37 and regulatory T cell associated with late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants.iScience · 2024Article
- Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and complications of late-onset neonatal sepsis among preterm neonates in Cyprus: a prospective case-control study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To construct a prediction model based on the data of premature infants and to apply the data in our study as external validation to the prediction model proposed by Yuejun Huang et al. to evaluate the predictive ability of both models. Methods: In total, 397 premature infants were randomly divided into the training set ( Results: In the current study, endotracheal intubation [odds ratio ( Conclusion: The prediction model showed a good predictive ability for late-onset sepsis in preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.