ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Overall survival nomogram and relapse-related factors of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney: A study based on published patients.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal clear cell sarcoma in children: A case report.Biomedical reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rarity limits the breadth of study on clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK). There is currently no predictive model that quantifies the overall survival (OS) of CCSK and a few large sample-based analysis of relapse-related factors. Methods: Patients were collected both from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and case report articles extracted from the global online document database to form 2 groups. The first was the OS group, which was used to build and verify the nomogram for predicting the OS of CCSK. Independent predictors of OS were screened by Cox regression analysis to develop the nomogram. Nomogram accuracy was assessed by C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. In addition, the difference in OS between receiving radiotherapy or not in stage I patients was analyzed by the Chi-square test. The second was the relapse group, which was used to analyze the relapse-related factors by Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Result: 256 patients were included in the OS group. The stage, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent OS-related factors of CCSK, and the nomogram for predicting the OS of CCSK was established based on them. The results of the C-index, ROC, calibration, and DCA curves showed that the nomogram has good discrimination, accuracy, and clinical profitability. The Chi-squared test showed no significant difference in OS with receiving radiotherapy or not in stage I patients. The relapse group included 153 patients, of which 60 relapsed. The univariate Cox regression analysis showed no correlation between radiotherapy and relapse. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that stage and surgery/chemotherapy sequence were the independent factors for relapse. The log-rank test of seven chemotherapeutic drugs showed that etoposide (E), cyclophosphamide (C), vincristine (V), and doxorubicin (D) (all Conclusion: Our nomogram accurately quantified the OS of CCSK. There was no significant difference in OS between receiving radiotherapy or not in stage I patients. Stage, surgery/chemotherapy sequence, and the use of ECVD were relapse-related factors. Radiotherapy had no significant contribution to preventing relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.