Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186441›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Network approaches for omics studies of neurodegenerative diseases.

Na Zhao, Zachary Quicksall, Yan W Asmann, Yingxue Ren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Na ZhaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Zachary QuicksallDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Yan W AsmannDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Yingxue RenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent methodological advances in multi-omics approaches, including genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, and proteomic, have revolutionized the research field by generating "big data" which greatly enhanced our understanding of the molecular complexity of the brain and disease states. Network approaches have been routinely applied to single-omics data to provide critical insight into disease biology. Furthermore, multi-omics integration has emerged as both a vital need and a new direction to connect the different layers of information underlying disease mechanisms. In this review article, we summarize popular network analytic approaches for single-omics data and multi-omics integration and discuss how these approaches have been utilized in studying neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasemulti-omics integrationnetworkneurodegenerative diseaseomics

Identifiers

PMID36186441
PMCPMC9523597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.