Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

A phenomenological study of online assessment during a pandemic crisis: Insights from Malaysia, Lithuania, and Spain.

Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Antonia Ramírez García, Viktorija Mažeikienė, Marwan Harb Alqaryouti, Radzuwan Ab Rashid, Arulselvi Uthayakumaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nagaletchimee AnnamalaiSchool of Distance Education (English Section), Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, Malaysia.
Antonia Ramírez GarcíaFaculty of Educational Sciences, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Viktorija MažeikienėFaculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Marwan Harb AlqaryoutiDepartment of English Language, Literature and Translation, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Radzuwan Ab RashidFaculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.
Arulselvi UthayakumaranCentre of Modern Languages, University of Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries, namely, Malaysia, Lithuania, and Spain, shifted to online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative case study, which involved 18 undergraduate students from the three countries, was conducted to probe insights into their online assessment experience. Data were interpreted from the perspective of the expectancy-value theory of motivation, which focuses on intrinsic attainment, utility, and cost values. The findings revealed that students were motivated to complete their assessment since they experienced flexibility besides having effective assessment guidelines. The positive experiences were related to intrinsic and attainment values; however, the students were also demotivated when stressed, indicating the high-cost value. Utility value was found to overlap with cost value in this study because students were dissatisfied with the online assessment and expressed less preference for this approach in future. This contributes to our understanding that educators must consider utility values when preparing online assessments. The pedagogical implications of this study revolve around the importance of a checklist, mock exams, alternative assessment (Plan B), and video demos for an effective assessment.

Indexed as

assessmentCOVID-19 pandemiconline learningphenomenologystudent experience

Identifiers

PMID36186328
PMCPMC9521351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.