Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186234›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical research & environmental sciences2022

Improving Invasive Breast Cancer Care Using Machine Learning Technology.

Clement G Yedjou, Solange S Tchounwou, Jameka Grigsby, Kearra Johnson, Paul B Tchounwou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clement G YedjouDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, 1610 S. Martin Luther King Blvd, Tallahassee, FL 32307, United States.
Solange S TchounwouDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. School of Medicine, Tulane University, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
Jameka GrigsbyDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Alcorn State University, 1000 ASU Drive, Alcorn State, MS 39096, United States.
Kearra JohnsonDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, 1400 Lynch Street, Box 18750, Jackson, MS 39217, United States.
Paul B TchounwouDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, 1400 Lynch Street, Box 18750, Jackson, MS 39217, United States.

Funding

Strengthening the Biomedical Data Science Training Program at Jackson State UniversityU54MD015929 · NIMHD · JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STEVENS, JACQUELINE JEANETTE · 2020 to 2024
$12.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. In the United States, the lifetime risk of developing an invasive form of breast cancer is 12.5% among women. BC arises in the lining cells (epithelium) of the ducts or lobules in the glandular tissue of the breast. The goal of the present study was to use machine learning (ML) as a novel technology to assess and compare the invasive forms of BC including, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, infiltrating lobular carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma. To achieve this goal, we used ML algorithms and collected a dataset of 334 BC patients available at https://www.kaggle.com/amandam1/breastcancerdataset and interpreted this dataset based on the form of BC, age, sex, tumor stages, surgery type, and survival rate. Among the 334 patients, 70% were diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 27% with infiltrating lobular carcinoma, and 3% with mucinous carcinoma. Overall, out of 334 BC patients: 64 (19.16%) were in stage I, 189 (56.59%) in stage II, and 81 (24.25%) in stage III. Sixty-six, 67, 96, and 105 patients underwent lumpectomy, simple mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, and other types of surgery, respectively. The survival rates were 83.4% for stage I, 79.1% for stage II, and 77% for stage III. Findings from the present study demonstrated that ML provides an important tool to curate large amount of BC data, as well as a scientific means to improve BC outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerinfiltrating ductal carcinomainfiltrating lobular carcinomamachine learningMachine Learningmucinous carcinomasurgery treatment

Identifiers

PMID36186234
PMCPMC9520759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.