ArticlePorto biomedical journal
The value of surgeon's perception during transurethral resection of bladder tumors: can we trust in our eyes and experience to predict grade and staging?
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances and Emerging Innovations in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature.Research and reports in urology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Factors Affecting Transurethral Bladder Tumor Resection Quality: A Single-center Study Including 1014 Procedures.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
- A Procedural Checklist for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors (TURBT) Enhances Operative Dictation and Assesses Surgeon Accuracy of Tumor Characteristic Predictions.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transurethral resection of newly diagnosed bladder tumors (TURBT) is a hallmark ¡n the treatment of bladder cancer. We evaluated the surgeon capacity to predict bladder tumor stage (T), grade, and presence of muscular layer based upon cystoscopic characteristics during primary TURBT. Methods: Prospective study enrolling 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary TURBT for newly diagnosed bladder cancers. Cystoscop¡c tumor characteristics at the time of TURBT was evaluated by an urology senior and a resident regarding histological grade, invasion (T stage), and presence of muscular layer in the specimen. We analyzed the surgeon's accuracy in predicting these parameters using the final histology as gold standard. In addition, the predictive capacity between seniors and residents was compared. Results: The resident's arm correctly predicted tumor invasiveness in 76% of cases, while seniors correctly predicted 87% of cases. Regarding tumor grade, high grade cancer was reported in 78% of the specimens and 75% and 77% of them were correctly predicted by residents and seniors, respectively. Finally, 80% of the TURBT specimens had muscle representativeness. In nearly 75% of the cases, both resident and senior correctly predicted the TURBT resection depth (presence of detrusor muscle in the specimen). The positive predictive value for this parameter was 79% for the resident, and 81% for the senior, and the negative predictive value was 25% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: The surgeon's naked eye analysis showed a good, but limited predictive ability to detect non-muscle invasive and high-grade bladder tumors in TURBT specimens. Positive predictive value for muscle representativeness is around 80%, which reinforces the need of carrying out a careful and extensive TURBT, irrespective of the surgeon experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.