Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186098›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacopuncture2022

Effectiveness of Acupuncture, Mind and Body Practices, and Natural Products for Insomnia: an overview of systematic reviews.

Jin Ju Yeo, Jang Won Lee, Kyung Sik Kim, Min Kyung Hyun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin Ju YeoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University Graduate School of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-1215
Jang Won LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University Graduate School of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-1829
Kyung Sik KimDepartment of Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-1420
Min Kyung HyunDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-8633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This overview summarizes the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of complementary therapies for insomnia through systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search on SRs and MAs for complementary therapies for insomnia was conducted using six databases. Results: This overview included 30 SRs/MAs. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) analysis of insomnia included 383 randomized controlled trials and 31,748 participants. Twenty-four SRs/MAs (80%) out of 30 SRs/MAs reported a positive result, and six SRs/MAs reported a partially positive result. The most frequently used form of acupuncture reported a positive effect in 89.5% (17/19) of SRs/MAs and a superior effect to western medicine, sham/placebo, and no treatment. The lack of protocol registration and the excluded studies list resulted in generally poor methodological and reporting quality in SRs/MAs with AMSTAR 2. Conclusion: This overview confirmed that complementary therapies positively affected the PSQI scores in patients with insomnia. However, better-designed primary studies are needed to strengthen the relevant evidence in the future. A more stringent assessment of multiple systematic reviews 2 must be followed when performing SR and MA.

Indexed as

complementary therapyinsomniaoverviewsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36186098
PMCPMC9510140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.