Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36186083›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production: The past, present, and future.

Becky N Aloo, Vishal Tripathi, Billy A Makumba, Ernest R Mbega

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strain-specific effects of soil cyanobacteria Nodosilinea sp. and Microcoleus sp. on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) nutrient uptake and soil fertility.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Biotechnological Applications of Bacteria.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Analyses of Antioxidative Response in Tomato (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Becky N AlooDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya.
Vishal TripathiDepartment of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Billy A MakumbaDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Ernest R MbegaDepartment of Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed increased agricultural production to match the global demand for food fueled by population increase. Conventional agricultural practices are heavily reliant on artificial fertilizers that have numerous human and environmental health effects. Cognizant of this, sustainability researchers and environmentalists have increased their focus on other crop fertilization mechanisms. Biofertilizers are microbial formulations constituted of indigenous plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that directly or indirectly promote plant growth through the solubilization of soil nutrients, and the production of plant growth-stimulating hormones and iron-sequestering metabolites called siderophores. Biofertilizers have continually been studied, recommended, and even successfully adopted for the production of many crops in the world. These microbial products hold massive potential as sustainable crop production tools, especially in the wake of climate change that is partly fueled by artificial fertilizers. Despite the growing interest in the technology, its full potential has not yet been achieved and utilization still seems to be in infancy. There is a need to shed light on the past, current, and future prospects of biofertilizers to increase their understanding and utility. This review evaluates the history of PGPR biofertilizers, assesses their present utilization, and critically advocates their future in sustainable crop production. It, therefore, updates our understanding of the evolution of PGPR biofertilizers in crop production. Such information can facilitate the evaluation of their potential and ultimately pave the way for increased exploitation.

Indexed as

biofertilizersmicrobial formulationsmicrobial stimulantsplant growth-promoting rhizobacteriasustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID36186083
PMCPMC9523260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.