Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185968›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Cuban Abdala vaccine: Effectiveness in preventing severe disease and death from COVID-19 in Havana, Cuba; A cohort study.

Pedro I Más-Bermejo, Félix O Dickinson-Meneses, Kenia Almenares-Rodríguez, Lizet Sánchez-Valdés, Raúl Guinovart-Díaz, María Vidal-Ledo, Enrique Galbán-García, Yadira Olivera-Nodarse, Isabel Morgado-Vega, Santiago Dueñas-Carrera and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pedro I Más-BermejoPedro Kourí Tropical Medicine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Félix O Dickinson-MenesesPedro Kourí Tropical Medicine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Kenia Almenares-RodríguezNational School of Public Health, Havana, Cuba.
Lizet Sánchez-ValdésMolecular Immunology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Raúl Guinovart-DíazMathematics and Computing Department, University of Havana, Havana, Cuba.
María Vidal-LedoNational School of Public Health, Havana, Cuba.
Enrique Galbán-GarcíaNational Institute of Gastroenterology, Havana, Cuba.
Yadira Olivera-NodarseProvincial Hygiene, Epidemiology and Microbiology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Isabel Morgado-VegaProvincial Hygiene, Epidemiology and Microbiology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Santiago Dueñas-CarreraGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Merardo PujolGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Francisco Hernández-BernalGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Miladys Limonta-FernándezGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Gerardo Guillén-NietoGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Verena L Muzio-GonzálezGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Marta Ayala-ÁvilaGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre, Havana, Cuba.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccines have proven safe and efficacious in reducing severe illness and death. Cuban protein subunit vaccine Abdala has shown safety, tolerability and efficacy (92·3% [95% CI: 85·7‒95·8]) against SARS-CoV-2 in clinical trials. This study aimed to estimate Abdala's real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE). Methods: This retrospective cohort study in Havana analyzed Cuban Ministry of Public Health databases (May 12-August 31, 2021) to assess VE in preventing severe illness and death from COVID-19 (primary outcomes). Cox models accounting for time-varying vaccination status and adjusting by demographics were used to estimate hazard ratios. A subgroup analysis by age group and a sensitivity analysis including a subgroup of tested persons (qRT-PCR) were conducted. Daily cases and deaths were modelled accounting for different VE. Findings: The study included 1 355 638 persons (Mean age: 49·5 years [SD: 18·2]; 704 932 female [52·0%]; ethnicity data unavailable): 1 324 vaccinated (partially/fully) and 31 433 unvaccinated. Estimated VE against severe illness was 93·3% (95% CI: 92·1-94·3) in partially- vaccinated and 98·2% (95% CI: 97·9-98·5) in fully-vaccinated and against death was 94·1% (95% CI: 92·5-95·4) in partially-vaccinated and 98·7% (95% CI: 98·3-99·0) in fully-vaccinated. VE exceeded 92·0% in all age groups. Daily cases and deaths during the study period corresponded to a VE above 90%, as predicted by models. Interpretation: The Cuban Abdala protein subunit vaccine was highly effective in preventing severe illness and death from COVID-19 under real-life conditions. Funding: Cuban Ministry of Public Health. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Centre.

Indexed as

Cohort studiesCOVID-19CubaEffectivenessSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36185968
PMCPMC9507841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.