ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Circulating C-Terminal Agrin Fragment: A Potential Marker for Sarcopenia Among Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- C-Terminal Agrin Fragment as a Biomarker for Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Pooled it
- Role of Agrin in tissue repair and regeneration: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of targeted intervention on C-terminal agrin fragment and its association with the components of sarcopenia: a scoping review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- C-terminal agrin fragment as a biomarker of muscle wasting and weakness: a narrative review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Undetected onset of sarcopenia among individuals with chronic diseases especially Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) makes it important to be evaluated. The feasibility of diagnosing sarcopenia in a clinical setup might be a difficult task. Circulating markers including C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF) are emerging as an alternative. Hence, the objectives of the study were to compare circulating CAF levels between T2D, prediabetes (PD) and healthy controls and to study its association with sarcopenic index, muscle mass, strength and quality. Methods: Ninety-nine participants (n = 42, T2D; n = 33, PD; n = 24, healthy controls) aged 18 to 60 yrs were recruited. HOMA (homeostatic model assessment) indices were derived using plasma glucose and insulin. All participants underwent lipid profiling, muscle strength including quality (isokinetic dynamometer), body composition (Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)) and sarcopenic index (appendicular skeletal muscle mass/body weight) assessment. Serum samples were used to estimate CAF levelsusing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Median CAF level was significantly higher among T2D group compared to PD and control groups (P < 0.0001). Circulating CAF levels correlated positively with age and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (both, P < 0.001) and negatively with HOMA-B and muscle quality (both, P < 0.001), and sarcopenic index (P = 0.07). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the odds of being in the highest tertile category was 7.67, 95% C.I. (2.10, 29.3) among T2D. Conclusion: Circulating CAF levels were significantly higher among T2D compared to PD and control study groups along with reduced skeletal muscle quality. This suggests that the circulating CAF level has the potential to be considered as a clinical marker to evaluate sarcopenia among T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.