ArticleCureus2022
The Efficacy of Compression Stockings on Patients With Nocturia: A Single-Arm Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disruption of circadian rhythm as a potential pathogenesis of nocturia.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBehavioral treatment for nocturia includes wearing compression stockings. However, a reading of the cited literature for evidence shows that there is not enough research data to support this recommendation, and it is controversial. The present study aimed to investigate and supplement evidence on the effects of wearing compression stockings during the daytime in patients with nocturia.
methodsThis was a single-arm prospective study to investigate the effects of compression stockings on nocturia for four weeks. Patients were asked to record a frequency-volume chart and complete various questionnaires at baseline and after four weeks, and also provide feedback on treatment satisfaction. The primary endpoint was a change in night-time frequency in the frequency-volume chart from the baseline to the end of treatment.
resultsThirty-four patients (19 men and 15 women; age: 72.3 ± 12.6 years) were included. Two patients dropped out because of pain associated with wearing compression stockings and one due to a refusal to wear compression stockings every day. Therefore 31 patients were analyzed. In the frequency-volume chart, night-time and 24-hour frequencies significantly decreased by 0.5 and 1.1 episodes, respectively (P = 0.004 and P = 0.035, respectively). The hours of undisturbed sleep significantly increased by 0.8 h (P = 0.013). No significant differences were observed in nocturnal or 24-h urine volumes, the number of urgency or urinary incontinence episodes, the mean or maximum voided volume, the nocturnal polyuria index, or the first night-time voided volume. The total overactive bladder symptom score significantly decreased (P = 0.006). Significant reductions were also observed in all overactive bladder symptom score subscores, except for the daytime frequency score.
conclusionThe present results suggest the effectiveness of wearing compression stockings during the day was satisfactory in most patients with nocturia, and the treatment was safely continued in patients who experienced no pain when wearing the stockings. Based on the results of this study, we believe that it is worth considering as a treatment for nocturia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.