Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185875›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

A Review of Commercially Available Point-of-Care Devices to Concentrate Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Toufic R Jildeh, Charles A Su, Matthew L Vopat, Justin R Brown, Johnny Huard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toufic R JildehOrthopedic Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Charles A SuOrthopedic Surgery, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, USA.
Matthew L VopatOrthopedic Surgery, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, USA.
Justin R BrownOrthopedic Surgery, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, USA.
Johnny HuardBiological Sciences, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a promising therapy treatment option for multiple orthopedic conditions, which has demonstrated expanding clinical use. With increased clinical use of PRP, there has been a greater demand for point-of-care (POC) biologic devices. For this review, publicly available information provided by the device corporations, PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched for studies related to POC device function. A scoping review study design was selected to explore the breadth of knowledge in the literature regarding PRP POC devices. ProofPoint Biologics demonstrated the highest laboratory platelet increase (5.2 ± 0.28-fold) and the longest processing time (49 ± 1.4 minutes). Celling demonstrated the lowest laboratory platelet increase (2.7 ± 0.8-fold), while AcCELLerated had the fastest processing time (18 ± 1.4 minutes for PurePRP® AB60 Pure (Pure Accelerated Biologics, Tequesta, FL) and 13.5 ± 2.1 minutes for AbsolutePRP® (Emcyte Corporation, Fort Myers, FL)). Celling had the lowest cost out of the various biologic devices. There is significant variability in the technical features, cost, processing time, and centrifugation parameters of the different commercially available point-of-care devices.

Indexed as

biologicsorthobiologicsplatelet rich plasmapoint-of-carepoint-of-care biologics

Identifiers

PMID36185875
PMCPMC9514393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.