Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185866›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Shelbie D Kirkendoll, Edward Kelly, Kristina Kramer, Reginald Alouidor, Eleanor Winston, Tyler Putnam, Gabriel Ryb, Nicolas Jabbour, Aixa Perez Coulter, Tovy Kamine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluating Surgical Outcomes in Acute Cholecystectomies.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shelbie D KirkendollDepartment of General Surgery, Valley Health System, Las Vegas, USA.
Edward KellyAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Kristina KramerAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Reginald AlouidorAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Eleanor WinstonAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Tyler PutnamAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Gabriel RybAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Nicolas JabbourAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Aixa Perez CoulterAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.
Tovy KamineAcute Care Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed less than 72 hours from hospital admission for acute cholecystitis has shown to decrease hospital cost without an increase in length of stay (LOS). Very few studies have examined clinical and cost outcomes of performing cholecystectomy less than 24 hours from hospital admission. The aim of this study was to examine the cost and LOS of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed on an early (less than 24 hours from admission) and late (more than 24 hours from hospital admission) basis. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of 569 patients at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA, who underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2020. We evaluated preoperative/postoperative LOS, operative duration, hospital cost, and patient complications. Results 468 patients underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during our study period. Early cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours from admission) had an overall decreased LOS (43.6 hours versus 102.9 hours, p-value < 0.01) and decreased hospital cost ($23,736.70 versus $30,176.40, p-value < 0.01) compared to late cholecystectomy (more than 24 hours from admission). There was also a significantly higher rate of bile leak in patients who underwent surgery more than 24 hours from hospital admission compared to those who had surgery less than 24 hours from admission (5.9% versus 0.4%, p-value < 0.01). Additionally, those procedures performed greater than 24 hours from hospital admission were significantly more likely to be converted to an open procedure (6.9% versus 2.2%, p-value = 0.02).  Conclusion Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 24 hours of hospital admission for acute cholecystitis decreased hospital cost, LOS, and operative complications in our institution's patient population. Our data suggests that performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital admission would be beneficial from a patient and hospital standpoint.

Indexed as

acute calculus cholecystitisbile leakbiliary diseasescholecystitiscostearly laparoscopic cholecystectomygallbladderlaporoscopic cholecystectomylength of staypost operative complications

Identifiers

PMID36185866
PMCPMC9519057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.