Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185748›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2023

Immunomodulatory hybrid micro-nanofiber scaffolds enhance vascular regeneration.

Siyang Liu, Liying Yao, Yumeng Wang, Yi Li, Yanju Jia, Yueyue Yang, Na Li, Yuanjing Hu, Deling Kong, Xianhao Dong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immune-Responsive Bioinks Enable Vision-GuidedAdvanced functional materials · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research Progress on Biomaterials with Immunomodulatory Effects in Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Living Nanofiber-Enabled Cardiac Patches for Myocardial Injury.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siyang LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Liying YaoTianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology/ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, 300199, China.
Yumeng WangCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Yi LiCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Yanju JiaTianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology/ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, 300199, China.
Yueyue YangCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Na LiTianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology/ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, 300199, China.
Yuanjing HuTianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology/ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, 300199, China.
Deling KongCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Xianhao DongCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Kai WangCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Meifeng ZhuCollege of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inertness of synthetic polymer materials and the insufficient mechanical strength of reprocessed decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) limited their promotive efforts on tissue regeneration. Here, we prepared a hybrid scaffold composed of PCL microfibers and human placental extracellular matrix (pECM) nanofibers by co-electrospinning, which was grafted with heparin and further absorbed with IL-4. The hybrid scaffold with improved hemocompatibility firstly switched macrophages to anti-inflammatory phenotype (increased by 18.1%) and then promoted migration, NO production, tube formation of endothelial cells (ECs), and migration and maturation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and ECM deposition

Indexed as

Hybrid scaffoldsImmunoregulationPCL microfiberPlacental ECM nanofiberVascular regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36185748
PMCPMC9486249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.