Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185591›Full record

ArticleArabian journal for science and engineering2023

Rule-Based Arabic Sentiment Analysis using Binary Equilibrium Optimization Algorithm.

Hichem Rahab, Hichem Haouassi, Abdelkader Laouid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arabian journal for science and engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent Developments in Equilibrium Optimizer Algorithm: Its Variants and Applications.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hichem RahabICOSI Laboratory, Abbes Laghrour University, BP 1252, 40004 El Houria, Khenchela, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-0901
Hichem HaouassiICOSI Laboratory, Abbes Laghrour University, BP 1252, 40004 El Houria, Khenchela, Algeria.
Abdelkader LaouidLIAP Laboratory, El Oued University, PO Box 789, 39000 El Oued, Algeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of websites and social networks, Internet users generate a massive amount of comments and information on the Web. Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, offers an opportunity to mine the people's sentiments and emotions from the textual comments. In the last decade, sentiment analysis has been applied in research areas such as recommendation and support systems and has become an area of interest for many researchers. Therefore, many studies have been carried out on English, while other languages, such as Arabic, received less attention. Increasingly, sentiment analysis researchers use machine learning due to its excellent performance. However, the generated models are black boxes and non-interpretable by the users. The rule-based classification is a promising approach for generating interpretable models. This work proposes a classification rule-based Arabic sentiment analysis approach together with a new binary equilibrium optimization metaheuristic algorithm as an optimization method for classification rule generation from Arabic documents. The proposed approach has been experimented on the Opinion Corpus for Arabic (OCA) and generates a classification model of thirteen rules. The comparison results with state-of-the-art methods show that the proposed approach outperforms all other white-box models regarding classification accuracy.

Indexed as

ArabicAssociative classificationEquilibrium optimization algorithmNatural language processingRule-based classificationSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID36185591
PMCPMC9513016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.