Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185462›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Research progress of CRISPR-based biosensors and bioassays for molecular diagnosis.

Kun Chen, Ziyi Shen, Guanzhen Wang, Wei Gu, Shengchao Zhao, Zihan Lin, Wei Liu, Yi Cai, Gohar Mushtaq, Jia Jia and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CRISPR/Cas Systems: Biological Basis and Genome Editing Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  3. Review
  4. [Gene doping: current test methods and analytical challenges].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  5. From conventional to biosensor-based detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Rapid molecular detection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prognosis-A Concise Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kun ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Ziyi ShenSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Guanzhen WangSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Wei GuSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Shengchao ZhaoSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Zihan LinSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Wei LiuUniversity and College Key Lab of Natural Product Chemistry and Application in Xinjiang, School of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Yili Normal University, Yining, China.
Yi CaiKey Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology and The State & NMPA Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gohar MushtaqCenter for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medicine, Idlib University, Idlib, Syria.
Jia JiaSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Chunpeng Craig WanJiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Nondestructive Testing of Fruits and Vegetables, College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Tingdong YanSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas technology originated from the immune mechanism of archaea and bacteria and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020 for its success in gene editing. Molecular diagnostics is highly valued globally for its development as a new generation of diagnostic technology. An increasing number of studies have shown that CRISPR/Cas technology can be integrated with biosensors and bioassays for molecular diagnostics. CRISPR-based detection has attracted much attention as highly specific and sensitive sensors with easily programmable and device-independent capabilities. The nucleic acid-based detection approach is one of the most sensitive and specific diagnostic methods. With further research, it holds promise for detecting other biomarkers such as small molecules and proteins. Therefore, it is worthwhile to explore the prospects of CRISPR technology in biosensing and summarize its application strategies in molecular diagnostics. This review provides a synopsis of CRISPR biosensing strategies and recent advances from nucleic acids to other non-nucleic small molecules or analytes such as proteins and presents the challenges and perspectives of CRISPR biosensors and bioassays.

Indexed as

biosensorCRISPR/Casmolecular diagnosticsnon-nucleic-acid analytesnucleic acid detection

Identifiers

PMID36185462
PMCPMC9524266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.