ArticleiScience2022
Motivational salience drives habitual gazes during value memory retention and facilitates relearning of forgotten value.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-inspired strategies for efficient artificial intelligence.Molecules and cells · 2026Review
- Principal axis of primate basal ganglia in processing cognitive flexibility and habitual stability.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Implication of regional selectivity of dopamine deficits in impaired suppressing of involuntary movements in Parkinson's disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- Gaze patterns reflect the retrieval and selection of memories in a context-dependent object location retrieval task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anatomical and Functional Comparison of the Caudate Tail in Primates and the Tail of the Striatum in Rodents: Implications for Sensory Information Processing and Habitual Behavior.Molecules and cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A habitual gaze is critical to efficiently identify and exploit valuable objects. However, it is unclear what salience components drive the habitual gaze choice. Here, we trained subjects to assign positive, neutral, and negative values to objects and found that motivational salience guided habitual gaze choices over 30 days of memory retention. The habitual preference for negatively valued objects emerged during memory retention. This habitual choice was not explained by a general model with salience components driven by physical features of objects and the rank of learned values. Instead, this is better explained by a model that contains an additional component driven by motivational salience. In a simulated value-forgotten condition, these motivational salience-based habitual choices facilitated re-learning. Our data indicate that after long-term retention, habitual gaze results from increased motivational salience, potentially facilitating the re-learning of forgotten values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.