Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185297›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Assessment of quantitative information for radiation therapy at a first-generation clinical photon-counting computed tomography scanner.

Guyue Hu, Katharina Niepel, Franka Risch, Christopher Kurz, Matthias Würl, Thomas Kröncke, Florian Schwarz, Katia Parodi, Guillaume Landry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guyue HuDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Garching bei München, Germany.
Katharina NiepelDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Garching bei München, Germany.
Franka RischDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Matthias WürlDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Garching bei München, Germany.
Thomas KrönckeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Florian SchwarzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Katia ParodiDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Garching bei München, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Garching bei München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the latest developments in X-ray computed tomography (CT), photon-counting technology allows spectral detection, demonstrating considerable advantages as compared to conventional CT. In this study, we investigated the use of a first-generation clinical photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) scanner and estimated proton relative (to water) stopping power (RSP) of tissue-equivalent materials from virtual monoenergetic reconstructions provided by the scanner. A set of calibration and evaluation tissue-equivalent inserts were scanned at 120 kVp. Maps of relative electron density (RED) and effective atomic number (EAN) were estimated from the reconstructed virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) using an approach previously applied to a spectral CT scanner with dual-layer detector technology, which allows direct calculation of RSP using the Bethe-Bloch formula. The accuracy of RED, EAN, and RSP was evaluated by root-mean-square errors (RMSE) averaged over the phantom inserts. The reference RSP values were obtained experimentally using a water column in an ion beam. For RED and EAN, the reference values were calculated based on the mass density and the chemical composition of the inserts. Different combinations of low- and high-energy VMIs were investigated in this study, ranging from 40 to 190 keV. The overall lowest error was achieved using VMIs at 60 and 180 keV, with an RSP accuracy of 1.27% and 0.71% for the calibration and the evaluation phantom, respectively.

Indexed as

effective atomic numberphoton-counting CTproton therapyrelative electron densityrelative stopping power (RSP)virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs)

Identifiers

PMID36185297
PMCPMC9515409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.