ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Incidence, mortality, and survival analyses of patients with thymic lymphoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hodgkin lymphoma in pre-existing thymoma: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the clinical and prognostic characteristics of thymic lymphoma and the effects of current treatments on the prognosis. Methods: Patients diagnosed as primary thymic lymphoma between 1975 and 2018 from the nine states of the US were identified, including Atlanta, Connecticut, Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, San Francisco-Oakland, Seattle-Puget Sound, and Utah. Incidence and mortality rates were analyzed using SEER*Stat 8.3.9 software. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to identify prognostic factors. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) among different treatments. Results: A total of 233 patients diagnosed as thymic lymphoma were identified, and eight of them were lost to follow-up or died upon diagnosis. The incidence of thymic lymphoma was 2.032 per ten million (95% CI: 1.777-2.312), and the mortality rate was 0.649 per ten million (95% CI: 0.508-0.817). Among the 225 patients with definite follow-up, 98 were males and 127 were females, with a median age of 33 years. The Cox regression results showed that age and pathological type were independent risk prognostic factors. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year OS were 80.0%, 77.5%, and 70.9%, respectively. For Ann Arbor stage I and II patients, there was no significant difference between the surgical group (N = 78) and the non-operative group (N = 65; P = 0.270). The radiotherapy group (N = 79) had better OS than the non-radiotherapy group (N = 64) in the first 25 years, and the prognosis in the later years was not significantly different (P = 0.051). The chemotherapy group (N = 37) had a significantly better prognosis than the non-chemotherapy group (N = 37; P = 0.020). Patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (N = 45) or who only received radiotherapy (N = 34) seemed to have better OS than that of patients who only received surgery (N = 33), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.063). Conclusions: Age and pathological type were independent prognostic factors for thymic lymphoma. Surgical treatment had limited effects on OS, while both radiotherapy and chemotherapy could significantly improve the survival outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.