Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A pro-oxidant combination of resveratrol and copper down-regulates hallmarks of cancer and immune checkpoints in patients with advanced oral cancer: Results of an exploratory study (RESCU 004).

Aishwarya Pilankar, Hitesh Singhavi, Gorantla V Raghuram, Sophiya Siddiqui, Naveen Kumar Khare, Vishalkumar Jadhav, Harshali Tandel, Kavita Pal, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Pankaj Chaturvedi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aishwarya PilankarTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Hitesh SinghaviHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Gorantla V RaghuramTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sophiya SiddiquiTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Naveen Kumar KhareTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Vishalkumar JadhavTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Harshali TandelTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Kavita PalTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Atanu BhattacharjeeHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Pankaj ChaturvediHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Indraneel MittraTranslational Research Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Our earlier studies have shown that cell-free chromatin particles (cfChPs) that are released from dying cancer cells are readily internalised by bystander cells leading to activation of two hallmarks of cancer viz. genome instability and inflammation. These hallmarks could be down-regulated by deactivating cfChPs Patients and methods: The study comprised of 25 patients divided into 5 equal groups. Five patients acted as controls; the remaining 20 were given R-Cu in four escalating doses. The lowest dose of R-Cu was 5.6mg and 560ng respectively, and the highest dose was 500mg and 5mg respectively. An initial biopsy was taken from patients at first presentation, and a second biopsy was taken 2 weeks later on the operating table. R-Cu was administered orally twice daily in the intervening period. Confocal microscopy was performed on tumour sections after fluorescent immuno-staining with anti-DNA and anti-histone antibodies to detect presence of cfChPs in the tumour micro-environment (TME). Immunofluorescence analysis was performed for 23 biomarkers representing the 10 Hallmarks of cancer, including 5 immune checkpoints, defined by Hanahan and Weinberg. Results: Confocal microscopy detected copious presence of cfChPs in TME of OSCC, which were eradicated/deactivated following two-week treatment with R-Cu. Eradication of cfChPs from TME was associated with marked down-regulation of 21/23 biomarkers, including the five immune checkpoints. The lower two doses of R-Cu were more effective than the higher doses. No adverse effects attributable to R-Cu were observed. Conclusion: These results suggest that cfChPs released into TME from dying cancer cells are global instigators for cancer hallmarks and immune checkpoints in surviving cancer cells. The ability of R-Cu to deactivate cfChPs raises the prospect of a novel and non-toxic form of cancer treatment which sans killing of cancer cells, and instead induces healing by down-regulating cancer hallmarks and immune check-points. Clinical Trial Registration: http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19801&EncHid=&userName=CTRI/2018/03/012459.

Indexed as

apoptosiscell deathimmune blockadeimmunotherapystresstumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36185249
PMCPMC9525028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.