Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Ultrasound-based radiomics analysis for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: From static images to CEUS video analysis.

Jun-Yan Zhu, Han-Lu He, Zi-Mei Lin, Jian-Qiang Zhao, Xiao-Chun Jiang, Zhe-Hao Liang, Xiao-Ping Huang, Hai-Wei Bao, Pin-Tong Huang, Fen Chen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun-Yan ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Han-Lu HeDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Zi-Mei LinUltrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jian-Qiang ZhaoTechnology Department, XENIRO, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Chun JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhe-Hao LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiao-Ping HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Hai-Wei BaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Pin-Tong HuangUltrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fen ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Continuous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) video is a challenging direction for radiomics research. We aimed to evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches with radiomics combined with the XGBoost model and a convolutional neural network (CNN) for discriminating between benign and malignant lesions in CEUS videos with a duration of more than 1 min. Methods: We gathered breast CEUS videos of 109 benign and 81 malignant tumors from two centers. Radiomics combined with the XGBoost model and a CNN was used to classify the breast lesions on the CEUS videos. The lesions were manually segmented by one radiologist. Radiomics combined with the XGBoost model was conducted with a variety of data sampling methods. The CNN used pretrained 3D residual network (ResNet) models with 18, 34, 50, and 101 layers. The machine interpretations were compared with prospective interpretations by two radiologists. Breast biopsies or pathological examinations were used as the reference standard. Areas under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of the models. Results: The CNN model achieved the best AUC of 0.84 on the test cohort with the 3D-ResNet-50 model. The radiomics model obtained AUCs between 0.65 and 0.75. Radiologists 1 and 2 had AUCs of 0.75 and 0.70, respectively. Conclusions: The 3D-ResNet-50 model was superior to the radiomics combined with the XGBoost model in classifying enhanced lesions as benign or malignant on CEUS videos. The CNN model was superior to the radiologists, and the radiomics model performance was close to the performance of the radiologists.

Indexed as

breast cancercontrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)convolutional neural network (CNN)machine learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36185229
PMCPMC9523748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.