Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36185223›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer.

Suying Yang, Jing Tang, Yue Rong, Min Wang, Jun Long, Cheng Chen, Cong Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06348784 (Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adenxa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06348784 completednot on this map

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adenxa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts

TypeobservationalSponsorAin Shams Maternity HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsEarly Detection of Ovarian CancerArmsAssesment of Different NEoplasias in the adenexa model, Risk of malignancy index, Histopathologic examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suying YangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Jing TangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Yue RongDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Min WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Jun LongDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Cheng ChenDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Cong WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This work was designed to investigate the performance of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) model combined with human epithelial protein 4 (HE4) for early ovarian cancer (OC) detection. Methods: A total of 376 women who were hospitalized and operated on in Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were selected. Ultrasonographic images, cancer antigen-125 (CA 125) levels, and HE4 levels were obtained. All cases were analyzed and the histopathological diagnosis serves as the reference standard. Based on the IOTA ADNEX model post-processing software, the risk prediction value was calculated. We analyzed receiver operating characteristic curves to determine whether the IOTA ADNEX model alone or combined with HE4 provided better diagnostic accuracy. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model alone or combined with HE4 in predicting benign and malignant ovarian tumors was 0.914 (95% CI, 0.881-0.941) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.883-0.942), respectively. With the cutoff risk of 10%, the ADNEX model had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and a specificity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.78), while combined with HE4, it had a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95) and a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86). The IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 was better at improving the accuracy of the differential diagnosis between different OCs than the IOTA ADNEX model alone. A significant difference was found in separating borderline masses from Stage II-IV OC ( Conclusions: A combination of the IOTA ADNEX model and HE4 can improve the specificity of diagnosis of ovarian benign and malignant tumors and increase the sensitivity and effectiveness of the differential diagnosis of Stage II-IV OC and borderline tumors.

Indexed as

human epididymis protein 4 (HE4)IOTA ADNEX modelovarian cancer (OC)receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curveserum cancer antigen-125 (CA 125)

Identifiers

PMID36185223
PMCPMC9523238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.