ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Analysis of Anti-Infective Treatment of 9 Neonates with
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal abscess caused by Raoultella ornithinolytica secondary to postoperative gastric fistula: case report and review of literature.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Retracted: Analysis of Anti-Infective Treatment of 9 Neonates withEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/7E94FD9DBBBE92C09011751A818F87
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raoul ornithine-releasing bacteria widely exist in water, plants, and soil, and colonize the digestive tract and upper respiratory tract of the human body. They are aerobic, unpowered, and capsular opportunistic pathogens. The infectivity of this bacterium is still uncertain, but the possibility of nosocomial infection has been mentioned in the literature. Studies have pointed out that the bacterium should be diagnosed in time and sensitive antibiotics should be used early. Once complicated with sepsis, it can cause multiple organ failure with a poor prognosis. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of nine cases of neonatal L. ornithine septicemia, to explore the clinical characteristics of neonatal L. ornithine septicemia and anti-infection therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.