Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36184916›Full record

ArticleDermatologic therapy2022

Fully home-based methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp: A real life open study.

Miguel Fernando García-Gil, Tamara Gracia-Cazaña, Paulina Cerro-Muñoz, Laura Bernal-Masferrer, Alba Navarro-Bielsa, Yolanda Gilaberte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-Applied Daylight Photodynamic Therapy: A Paradigm Shift?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. [Treatment of actinic keratoses in older adults].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Fernando García-GilDermatology Unit, Hospital Obispo Polanco, Teruel, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2807-2730
Tamara Gracia-CazañaDermatology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0523-2076
Paulina Cerro-MuñozDermatology Unit, Hospital Obispo Polanco, Teruel, Spain.
Laura Bernal-MasferrerDermatology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Alba Navarro-BielsaDermatology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-6007
Yolanda GilaberteDermatology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-3617
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESHospital Obispo Polanco · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy (MAL DL-PDT) is highly efficacious for the treatment of nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK), even when partially performed at home. To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of MAL DL-PDT performed completely by the patient in real life conditions. An open prospective study was conducted in Spain among patients diagnosed with at least five AK lesions on the face or the scalp. Patients received instruction and information in infographic format to perform MAL DL-PDT at home. All had been treated with 30% urea daily for 7 days before the day of MAL DL-PDT. Meteorological conditions on the day of the treatment and adverse effects were recorded. Patients underwent follow-up, and a second session of home-based MAL DL-PDT if deemed necessary, 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment session. The study population consisted of 22 patients (19 men and three women, mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 72.05 [6.96] years). A complete response was observed in 47.7% of AK lesions at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 65.9% (n = 199) at 12 months (p < 0.001). Olsen grade II lesions showed the highest rate of response (76.07% at 12 months). The mean (SD) actinic keratosis area and severity index score decreased significantly from 4.99 (2.43) at baseline to 2.33 (1.01) at 12 months (p = 0.0234). Adverse effects were mild and expected. A majority of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatment instruction provided (90.9%) and the treatment outcome (72.7%). MAL DL-PDT can be applied at home like any other topical treatment for AK. Our results indicate good long-term effectiveness, a high level of patient satisfaction, and no significant side effects.

Indexed as

Keratosis, ActinicPhotochemotherapyAgedAminolevulinic AcidFemaleHumansMalePhotosensitizing AgentsProspective StudiesScalpSunlightTreatment OutcomeAminolevulinic Acidmethyl 5-aminolevulinatePhotosensitizing Agentsactinic keratosisdaylightphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID36184916
PMCPMC9787539
OpenAlexW4300688663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.