Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36184849›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2023

Systematic review of groin wound surgical site infection incidence after arterial intervention.

Brenig Llwyd Gwilym, Dafydd Tudor Locker, Emily Kate Matthews, Eshan Mazumdar, Georgia Adamson, Michael Lewis Wall, David Charles Bosanquet

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brenig Llwyd GwilymSouth East Wales Vascular Network, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-8720
Dafydd Tudor LockerSouth East Wales Vascular Network, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.
Emily Kate MatthewsSouth East Wales Vascular Network, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.
Eshan MazumdarSouth East Wales Vascular Network, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.
Georgia AdamsonBlack Country Vascular Network, Russell Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.
Michael Lewis WallUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
David Charles BosanquetSouth East Wales Vascular Network, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-0489
Royal Gwent Hospital · GBRussells Hall Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives were to determine the surgical site infection incidence (including superficial/deep) fter arterial intervention through non-infected groin incisions and identify variables associated with incidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomised controlled trials and observational studies of adults undergoing arterial intervention through a groin incision and reported surgical site infection. Infection incidence was examined in subgroups, variables were subjected to meta-regression. One hundred seventeen studies reporting 65 138 groin incisions in 42 347 patients were included. Overall surgical site infection incidence per incision was 8.1% (1730/21 431): 6.3% (804/12 786) were superficial and 1.9% (241/12 863) were deep. Superficial infection incidence was higher in randomised controlled trials (15.8% [278/1762]) compared with observational studies (4.8% [526/11 024]); deep infection incidence was similar (1.7% (30/1762) and 1.9% (211/11 101) respectively). Aneurysmal pathology (β = -10.229, P < .001) and retrospective observational design (β = -1.118, P = .002) were associated with lower infection incidence. Surgical site infection being a primary outcome was associated with a higher incidence of surgical site infections (β = 3.429, P = .017). The three-fold higher incidence of superficial surgical site infection reported in randomised controlled trials may be because of a more robust clinical review of patients. These results should be considered when benchmarking practice and could inform future trial design.

Indexed as

Surgical WoundSurgical Wound InfectionAdultGroinHumansIncidenceRetrospective Studiesgroin incisionssurgical site infectionvascular

Identifiers

PMID36184849
PMCPMC10031242
OpenAlexW4300089641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.