ReviewThe Permanente journal2022
Electronic Cigarettes: A Narrative Review and Cohort Study of Electronic Cigarette Users in the Otolaryngology Clinic.
Review in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifaceted Evaluation of Inhibitors of Anti-Apoptotic Proteins in Head and Neck Cancer: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Studies (Review).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Characterizing Tobacco Usage in Otolaryngology Patients to Target Smoking Cessation Efforts.Tobacco use insights · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs) are growing in popularity, particularly in young adults. While in vitro and murine models have demonstrated potentially harmful health effects of ENDSs, long-term health effects and clinical outcomes are generally unknown. Use as a smoking cessation aid is propagated by studies of potential harm reduction compared to conventional cigarette smoking. We present a review of the current controversies of ENDS use and present a novel cohort of patients visiting the otolaryngology clinic with known ENDS use to understand their clinical and demographic characteristics and the prevalence of otolaryngologic inflammatory diagnoses. Eighty-eight patients had 105 diagnoses. Forty-three (48.9%) ENDS users had at least 1 inflammatory diagnosis. ENDS use was more common in White, male patients between the ages of 18 and 35 years. The most common inflammatory diagnoses were chronic otitis media (17.4%) and allergic rhinitis (13.0%). While the rate of inflammatory disease was significantly higher in male than in female patients (60.7% vs 28.1% p = 0.003), no significant association was seen between inflammatory disease and age, race/ethnicity, or length of ENDS use. The identification and description of patients with ENDS use will help clinicians' better risk-stratify otolaryngologic diagnoses associated with this novel health behavior. Additionally, further clinical research is necessary to elucidate long-term health outcomes of ENDS use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.