Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36184735›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

The clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics.

Alexis Mosca, Ana Teresa Abreu Y Abreu, Kok Ann Gwee, Gianluca Ianiro, Jan Tack, Thi Viet Ha Nguyen, Colin Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Postbiotic ContainingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Alexis MoscaPediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, APHP Robert Debré, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9504-5516
Ana Teresa Abreu Y AbreuGastroenterologist and Neuro-gastroenterologist, Angeles del Pedregal Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico.
Kok Ann GweeDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and Gleneagles Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4813-0053
Gianluca IaniroGastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario"A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-0515
Jan TackDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-6704
Thi Viet Ha NguyenDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Children's Hospital, Vietnam.
Colin HillAPC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-1445
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRChildren's Hospital 1 · VNHospital Angeles Pedregal · MXKU Leuven · BENational University of Singapore · SGUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An optimally operating microbiome supports protective, metabolic, and immune functions, but disruptions produce metabolites and toxins which can be involved in many conditions. Probiotics have the potential to manage these. However, their use in vulnerable people is linked to possible safety concerns and maintaining their viability is difficult. Interest in postbiotics is therefore increasing. Postbiotics contain inactivated microbial cells or cell components, thus are more stable and exert similar health benefits to probiotics. To review the evidence for the clinical benefits of postbiotics in highly prevalent conditions and consider future potential areas of benefit. There is growing evidence revealing the diverse clinical benefits of postbiotics in many prevalent conditions. Postbiotics could offer a novel therapeutic approach and may be a safer alternative to probiotics. Establishing interaction mechanisms between postbiotics and commensal microorganisms will improve the understanding of potential clinical benefits and may lead to targeted postbiotic therapy.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaProbioticsHumansallergyclinical benefitsgastrointestinal disordersmetabolic syndromemicrobial therapeuticsMicrobiotapostbioticsstressupper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID36184735
PMCPMC9542959
OpenAlexW4300002061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.