Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36184674›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2022

Establishing Peer Consensus About the Use of Long-Term Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh for Hernia (Grades 2-3) as the Standard of Care.

Salvador Morales-Conde, Frederick Berrevoet, Lars Nannestad Jorgensen, Domenico Marchi, Pablo Ortega-Deballon, Alistair Windsor

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Salvador Morales-CondeUnit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain. smoralesc@gmail.com.
Frederick BerrevoetDepartment of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Lars Nannestad JorgensenDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Domenico MarchiColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pablo Ortega-DeballonDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
Alistair WindsorConsultant Surgeon, HCA Healthcare UK, London Digestive Centre, London, UK.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKGhent University Hospital · BEHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInforma Healthcare · GBMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard synthetic and biologic meshes, often used in hernia repair, have commonly been used and each have their strengths but associated drawbacks. Long-term biosynthetic absorbable (LTBA) mesh has been developed to combine the strengths of synthetic and biologic meshes without the associated weaknesses. As a newer type of mesh, the supporting evidence base is still growing, and their optimum use has yet to be defined. This consensus was initiated to provide insight into those situations where a LTBA might be considered the Standard of Care in ventral hernia repair grades 2-3 (original classification, 2010) of the Ventral Hernia Working Group.

methodsA steering group of expert surgeons identified 35 statements, based around the evidence supporting LTBA, surgical technique, patients type most suitable for LTBA, risk-benefit of LTBA, patient and surgeon considerations, LTBA value. Surgeons involved in hernia repair received an online survey to assess consensus with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 70% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed. Statements that had not achieved consensus agreement were revised and these were then issued for a subsequent round. Finally, 34 statements were included.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-five surgeons were involved. Fourteen statements (41%) achieved very high consensus, 24 achieved consensuses (≥ 70-< 90%), whilst one (3%) just failed to achieve consensus with an agreement score of 69%.

conclusionsExpert consensus opinion about the use of LTBA for hernia (Grades 2-3) as the Standard of Care was achieved. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group derived eleven keys.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansStandard of CareSurgical MeshBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID36184674
OpenAlexW4299804796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.