Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36184635›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2023

MR imaging profile and histopathological characteristics of tumour vasculature, cell density and proliferation rate define two distinct growth patterns of human brain metastases from lung cancer.

Makoto Kiyose, Eva Herrmann, Jenny Roesler, Pia S Zeiner, Joachim P Steinbach, Marie-Therese Forster, Karl H Plate, Marcus Czabanka, Thomas J Vogl, Elke Hattingen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Makoto KiyoseInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Eva HerrmannInstitute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jenny RoeslerNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Pia S ZeinerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Joachim P SteinbachFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marie-Therese ForsterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karl H PlateNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marcus CzabankaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas J VoglDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elke HattingenInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michel MittelbronnNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stella BreuerInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Patrick N HarterNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon BernatzFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Simon.Bernatz@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-8100

Funding

FNR: PEARL P16/BM/11192868 grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-invasive prediction of the tumour of origin giving rise to brain metastases (BMs) using MRI measurements obtained in radiological routine and elucidating the biological basis by matched histopathological analysis.

methodsPreoperative MRI and histological parameters of 95 BM patients (female, 50; mean age 59.6 ± 11.5 years) suffering from different primary tumours were retrospectively analysed. MR features were assessed by region of interest (ROI) measurements of signal intensities on unenhanced T1-, T2-, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) normalised to an internal reference ROI. Furthermore, we assessed BM size and oedema as well as cell density, proliferation rate, microvessel density and vessel area as histopathological parameters.

resultsApplying recursive partitioning conditional inference trees, only histopathological parameters could stratify the primary tumour entities. We identified two distinct BM growth patterns depending on their proliferative status: Ki67

conclusionInterpretable and easy to obtain MRI features may not be sufficient to predict directly the primary tumour entity of BM but seem to have the potential to aid differentiating high- and low-proliferative BMs, such as SCLC and NSCLC.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedCell ProliferationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansKi-67 AntigenMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesKi-67 AntigenBrain metastasisHistopathologyImaging biomarkerMagnetic resonance imagingTumour vasculature

Identifiers

PMID36184635
PMCPMC9859874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.