Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36183669›Full record

ArticleCognitive psychology2022

Developmental trajectories of delay discounting from childhood to young adulthood: longitudinal associations and test-retest reliability.

Samuel D Klein, Paul F Collins, Monica Luciana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Associations Between Steep Delay Discounting and Punishment Learning.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel D KleinDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: klei0742@umn.edu.
Paul F CollinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Monica LucianaDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Adolescent Brain Development and Effects of Drug AbuseR01DA017843 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUCIANA, MONICA · 2004 to 2008
$2.8M
Disrupted development of neural connections by alcohol initiation in adolescenceR01AA020033 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LUCIANA, MONICA · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Training in genetic and neurobehavioral mechanisms of addictionT32DA050560 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Scott Ian Vrieze · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020033NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017843NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA050560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting (DD) indexes an individual's preference for smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards, and is considered a form of cognitive impulsivity. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that DD peaks in adolescence; longitudinal studies are needed to validate this putative developmental trend, and to determine whether DD assesses a temporary state, or reflects a more stable behavioral trait. In this study, 140 individuals aged 9-23 completed a delay discounting (DD) task and cognitive battery at baseline and every-two years thereafter, yielding five assessments over approximately 10 years. Models fit with the inverse effect of age best approximated the longitudinal trajectory of two DD measures, hyperbolic discounting (log[k]) and area under the indifference-point curve (AUC). Discounting of future rewards increased rapidly from childhood to adolescence and appeared to plateau in late adolescence for both models of DD. Participants with greater verbal intelligence and working memory displayed reduced DD across the duration of the study, suggesting a functional interrelationship between these domains and DD from early adolescence to adulthood. Furthermore, AUC demonstrated good to excellent reliability across assessment points that was superior to log(k), with both measures demonstrating acceptable stability once participants reached late adolescence. The developmental trajectories of DD we observed from childhood through young adulthood suggest that DD may index cognitive control more than reward sensitivity, and that despite modest developmental changes with maturation, AUC may be conceptualized as a trait variable related to cognitive control vs impulsivity.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImpulsive BehaviorReproducibility of ResultsRewardYoung AdultAdolescenceCognitive controlCognitive developmentDelay discountingImpulsivityLongitudinal analysis

Identifiers

PMID36183669
PMCPMC10888509
OpenAlexW4297991974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.