Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36183329›Full record

ReviewThe Medical journal of Australia2022

Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management.

Isabella Sc Williams, Aoife McVey, Sachin Perera, Jonathan S O'Brien, Louise Kostos, Kenneth Chen, Shankar Siva, Arun A Azad, Declan G Murphy, Veeru Kasivisvanathan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Medical journal of Australia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabella Sc WilliamsRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
Aoife McVeyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Sachin PereraRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
Jonathan S O'BrienPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Louise KostosPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Kenneth ChenPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Shankar SivaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Arun A AzadPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Declan G MurphyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Veeru KasivisvanathanPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Nathan LawrentschukRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
Mark FrydenbergMonash University, Melbourne, VIC.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity College London · GBMonash University · AUSingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection and management of prostate cancer has evolved over the past decade, with a focus now on harm minimisation and reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment, given the proven improvements in survival from randomised controlled trials. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now an important aspect of the diagnostic pathway in prostate cancer, improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, enabling accurate localisation of appropriate sites to biopsy, and reducing unnecessary biopsies in most patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Biopsies are now performed transperineally, substantially reducing the risk of post-procedure sepsis. Australian-led research has shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has superior accuracy in the staging of prostate cancer than conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scan). Localised prostate cancer that is low risk (International Society for Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade 1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; and ISUP grade group 2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 with less than 10% pattern 4) can be offered active surveillance, reducing harms from overtreatment. Prostatectomy and definitive radiation remain the gold standard for localised intermediate and high risk disease. However, focal therapy is an emerging experimental treatment modality in Australia in carefully selected patients. The management of advanced prostate cancer treatment has evolved to now include several novel agents both in the metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease settings. Multimodal therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, additional systemic therapy and radiotherapy are often recommended. PSMA-based radioligand therapy has emerged as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and is currently being evaluated in earlier disease states.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAustraliaHumansMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensChemotherapyProstateProstatic neoplasmsRadiation oncologyRadiotherapySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID36183329
PMCPMC9828197
OpenAlexW4299348313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.