Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36183102›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of medical research2022

Study of damage control strategy for non-traumatic diseases: a single-center observational study.

Fumiko Nakamura, Rintaro Yui, Atsunori Onoe, Masanobu Kishimoto, Kazuhito Sakuramoto, Takashi Muroya, Kentaro Kajino, Hitoshi Ikegawa, Yasuyuki Kuwagata

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fumiko NakamuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. whomeco.68@gmail.com.
Rintaro YuiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Atsunori OnoeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Masanobu KishimotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kazuhito SakuramotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Takashi MuroyaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kentaro KajinoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Hitoshi IkegawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Yasuyuki KuwagataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDamage control strategy (DCS) has been introduced not only for trauma but also for acute abdomen, but its indications and usefulness have not been clarified. We examined clinical characteristics of patients who underwent DCS and compared clinical characteristics and results with and without DCS in patients with septic shock.

methodsWe targeted a series of endogenous abdominal diseases in Kansai Medical University Hospital from April 2013 to March 2019. Clinical characteristics of 26 patients who underwent DCS were examined. Then, clinical characteristics and results were compared between the DCS group (n = 26) and non-DCS group (n = 31) in 57 patients with septic shock during the same period.

resultsAll 26 patients who underwent DCS had septic shock, low mean arterial pressure (MAP) before the start of surgery, and required high-dose norepinephrine administration intraoperatively. Their discharge mortality rate was 12%. Among the patients with septic shock, the DCS group had a higher SOFA score (P = 0.008) and MAP was lower preoperatively, but it did not increase even with intraoperative administration of large amounts of fluid replacement and vasoconstrictor. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality and discharge mortality between the two groups.

conclusionsDCS may be useful in patients with severe septic shock.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticHumansNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAcute abdomenDamage control strategyNon-traumatic diseasesOpen abdominal managementSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID36183102
PMCPMC9526978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.