ArticleTrials2022
Ceftriaxone compared with penicillin G for the treatment of neurosyphilis: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic and laboratory characteristics of neurosyphilis: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary dermatosis hospital.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Neurosyphilis and Parkinsonism: Overlapping Pathophysiology and Emerging Therapeutic Insights.Current neurovascular research · 2026Review
- The Great Imitator: A Case of Secondary Neurosyphilis With Unusual Neurological Manifestations.Cureus · 2025Article
- Syphilis and the Eye: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges, and Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Chronic meningitis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Review
- Case report-Depression with psychotic features as an atypical presentation of neurosyphilis.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Southern African HIV Clinicians Society Guideline for the clinical management of syphilis.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2024Article
- Treatment of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in Europe: gonorrhoea,The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
- Neurosyphilis: insights into its pathogenesis, susceptibility, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurosyphilis may cause irreversible neurological sequelae. First-line treatment consists of penicillin G, with ceftriaxone being an alternative treatment in patients allergic to penicillin. The lack of clinical data comparing the efficacy of these two drugs indicated the need for comparative clinical trials to improve national treatment guidelines in China. METHODS/
designIn this multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial, 290 patients newly diagnosed with neurosyphilis will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with aqueous crystalline penicillin G (ACPG) or ceftriaxone. Patients will be treated with standard regimens of ACPG or ceftriaxone according to Chinese National Guidelines and will be followed up for 12 months. All clinical parameters will be assessed at baseline and at follow-up 3, 6, 9, and 12 months later. The primary outcomes will include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) count, serological efficacy, and clinical efficacy. The secondary outcomes will include CSF protein concentrations, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, imaging results, recurrence, and time to recovery from neurosyphilis. Adverse events will be monitored and recorded during the trial. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide clinical data to determine whether ceftriaxone is non inferior to ACPG in treating neurosyphilis and will provide evidence for the improvement of treatment guidelines.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100047164. Registered on 9 June 2021 and updated on 23 November 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.