Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36183012›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2023

Survey of perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia.

Heather G Mack, Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones, Myra B McGuinness, Fred K Chen, John R Grigg, Robyn V Jamieson, Thomas L Edwards, John De Roach, Fleur O'Hare, Keith R Martin and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heather G MackOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. hmack@eyesurgery.com.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-1098
Alexis Ceecee Britten-JonesOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-2870
Myra B McGuinnessCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-040X
Fred K ChenOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2809-9930
John R GriggSave Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-8119
Robyn V JamiesonEye Genetics Research Unit, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Save Sight Institute, Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas L EdwardsOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John De RoachCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-5380
Fleur O'HareOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-0527
Keith R MartinOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lauren N AytonOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-084X
The University of Melbourne · AULions Eye Institute · AUChildren's Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many gene therapies are in development for treating people with inherited retinal diseases (IRD). We hypothesized that potential recipients of gene therapy would have knowledge gaps regarding treatment. We aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of genetic therapies among potential recipients with IRD, using a novel instrument we designed (Attitudes to Gene Therapy-Eye (AGT-Eye)) and their associations with demographic data, self-reported visual status, and tools assessing quality of life and attitudes toward clinical trials using a community-based cross-sectional survey of Australian adults with IRD. AGT-Eye, overall quality of life EQ-5D-5L, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) and Patient Attitudes to Clinical Trials (PACT-22) instruments were administered. Six hundred and eighty-one people completed the study, 51.7% women of mean age 53.5 years (SD ± 15.8). Most participants (91.6%) indicated they would likely accept gene therapy if it was available to them or family members. However, only 28.3% agreed that they had good knowledge of gene therapy. Most obtained information about gene therapy from the internet (49.3%). Respondents with post-graduate degrees scored highest compared to other educational levels on methods (p < 0.001) and outcomes (p = 0.003) and were more likely to see economic value of treatment (p = 0.043). Knowledge gaps were present regarding methods and outcomes of gene therapy. This survey has shown high level of interest in the IRD community for gene therapies, and highlights areas for improved clinician and patient education.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRetinal DiseasesAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetinaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36183012
PMCPMC10113139
OpenAlexW4298393141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.