ArticleBMC microbiology2022
In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and -negative organisms in China: the 2018 results from the ATLAS program.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistant Morganella morganii clinical isolates.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Pooled it
- Geographical mapping and temporal trends of Acinetobacter baumannii carbapenem resistance: A comprehensive meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of ceftaroline fosamil in the management of patients with methicillin-resistantEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
- From Environmental Organism to Nosocomial Threat:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Antimicrobial susceptibility study to compare the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents in the Philippines against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from different infection sites: results from ATLAS surveillance program (2018-2021).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Novel antimicrobial strategies for diabetic foot infections: addressing challenges and resistance.Acta diabetologica · 2025Review
- Advancements in alternative approaches to address antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pneumonia: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on antibiotic resistance is essential to adapt treatment strategies against the rapidly changing reality of antimicrobial resistance.
objectiveTo study the in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from China in the year 2018.
methodsA total of 2301 clinical isolates were collected from 17 medical center laboratories in China, which participated in the ATLAS program in 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by the broth microdilution method at a central laboratory. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints were used to interpret the results except for tigecycline, for which the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoint were used.
resultsThe susceptibility rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), and β-hemolytic streptococcus to ceftaroline were 83.9%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Escherichia coli, imipenem-susceptible (IMP-S) Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, IMP-S Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had high susceptibility rates to ceftazidime-avibactam (95.8%, 100%, 97.7%, 94.5%, 100%, 90.2%, 96.0%, 97.5% and 90.7%, respectively). However, imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated low susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (33.3% and 75.8%, respectively). Against MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), S. pneumoniae and β-hemolytic streptococci, the susceptibility rates of tigecycline were 93.5%, 99.2%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Levofloxacin also showed high in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae and β-hemolytic streptococci with a susceptibility rate of 100% and 98.4%. The susceptibility rate of E. faecalis to ampicillin was 100%. Among Gram-negative isolates, tigecycline and colistin showed good activity against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, imipenem-resistant E. cloacae, C. freundii and A. baumannii (susceptibility rates and intermediate susceptibility rates of 99.3% and 96.8%, 95.4% and 94.5%, 100% and 87.5%, 96.4% and 89.3%, MIC
conclusionCeftaroline showed good activity among tested antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive species, while ceftazidime-avibactam had good activity against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa excluding carbapenem-resistant isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.