Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36182746›Full record

ArticlePublic health2022

A longitudinal study of COVID-19 disclosure stigma and COVID-19 testing hesitancy in the United States.

L Dayton, W Song, I Kaloustian, E L Eschliman, J C Strickland, C Latkin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L DaytonDepartment of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA. Electronic address: Ldayton2@jhu.edu.
W SongDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
I KaloustianDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
E L EschlimanDepartment of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
J C StricklandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
C LatkinDepartment of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Effects of Drug Use, Depression, and Social Factors on HIV/HCV Care Continuum among PWID in Urban Areas: A Social-Network PerspectiveR01DA040488 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A, TOBIN, KARIN E · 2015 to 2020
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examines the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and COVID-19 testing hesitancy and assesses their changes between November 2020 and 2021. STUDY

designThis was a longitudinal cohort.

methodsA total of 355 participants completed four study waves between November 2020 and November 2021. Factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha assessed the factor structure and internal consistency of the COVID-19 Disclosure Stigma scale. Paired t-tests and McNemar's Chi-squared test assessed change between the study waves. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and testing hesitancy at four study waves.

resultsCOVID-19 disclosure stigma declined significantly between the last study waves (P = 0.030). The greatest disclosure concern was reporting a positive test to close contacts (range: 19%-21%) followed by disclosure to friends (range: 10%-15%) and family (range: 4%-10%). Over the course of the four study waves, COVID-19 testing hesitancy when symptomatic ranged from 23% to 30%. Older age, female gender, and having received a COVID-19 vaccine were associated with decreased odds of testing hesitancy. Greater COVID-19 disclosure stigma and more conservative political ideology showed a consistent relationship with increased odds of COVID-19 testing hesitancy.

conclusionsStudy findings suggest that many people anticipate feeling stigmatized when disclosing positive test results, especially to close contacts. A substantial percentage of study participants reported hesitancy to be tested when symptomatic. This study identifies a need for interventions that normalize COVID-19 testing (e.g. engaging leaders with conservative followings), provide strategies for disclosing positive results, and allow anonymous notification of potential COVID-19 exposure.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisclosureCOVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCoronavirusCOVID-19 disclosure stigmaCOVID-19 testing hesitancyStigma

Identifiers

PMID36182746
PMCPMC9411141
OpenAlexW4293216973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.