Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36182572›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2022

Predictors of Non-Response to a Sexual Health Survey in a North American Preconception Cohort Study.

Julia C Bond, Jasmine Abrams, Amelia K Wesselink, Katharine O White, Kenneth J Rothman, Lauren A Wise

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia C BondDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jcbond@bu.edu.
Jasmine AbramsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Maternal and Child Health Center of Excellence, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Amelia K WesselinkDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Katharine O WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth J RothmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

An internet-based preconception cohort study in North America and DenmarkR01HD086742 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LAUREN A WISE · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
Feasibility of an internet-based study of time-to-pregnancy in the United StatesR21HD072326 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WISE, LAUREN A · 2013 to 2014
$337k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086742NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD072326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefusal to participate in studies related to sexual health can compromise the internal and external validity of findings. Research examining non-response to sexual health studies has primarily focused on predictors such as specific sexual attitudes and behaviors.

aimEvaluate predictors of non-response to a supplemental sexual health survey added to a web-based cohort study, focusing on predictors that may be important in epidemiologic studies of sexual health.

methodsIn March 2021, we added the "Sexual Health and Wellbeing Questionnaire" (SQ), an optional supplemental sexual health survey, to the protocol for Pregnancy Study Online , a web-based North American prospective cohort study. Eligible participants identified as female and were aged 21-45 years, actively trying to conceive, and in a relationship with a male partner. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire at enrollment and follow-up questionnaires every 8 weeks. Participants were invited to complete the SQ 30 days after baseline questionnaire completion. The analytic sample included all Pregnancy Study Online participants who enrolled between March 2021 and December 2021 and was divided into 3 mutually-exclusive groups: (i) those who completed the baseline questionnaire only (ie, did not complete a follow-up questionnaire or the SQ), (ii) those who completed at least 1 follow-up questionnaire but not the SQ, and (iii) participants who completed the SQ (with or without a follow-up questionnaire). We compared sociodemographic, medical, lifestyle, and reproductive factors across these groups.

resultsOf the 1,491 enrolled participants, 302 (20.3%) completed the baseline questionnaire only, 259 (17.4%) completed a follow-up questionnaire but not the SQ, and 930 (62.4%) completed the SQ. Strong predictors of non-response (absolute difference in response >10% comparing SQ responders to baseline-only responders) included longer pregnancy attempt time at study entry, a history of infertility, and lower income and education. Compared with response to the follow-up questionnaire only, SQ response was lower among Hispanic/Latina participants and participants aged <25 years. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: The addition of sexual health surveys to established cohort studies may be an effective way to expand epidemiologic sex research efforts. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Study strengths include the prospective design, geographic heterogeneity of the cohort, and use of online methods. Our findings may not generalize to clinic-based sex research.

conclusionWe report that in an established North American cohort study, response to the SQ exceeded 60%. We observed few strong predictors for SQ non-response among engaged participants. Bond JC, Abrams J, Wesselink AK, et al. Predictors of Non-Response to a Sexual Health Survey in a North American Preconception Cohort Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:1707-1715.

Indexed as

Sexual HealthCohort StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleNorth AmericaPregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesCohort StudiesNon-respondentsSelection BiasSurvey Methods

Identifiers

PMID36182572
PMCPMC9617790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.