Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36182280›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Robert A Lutfi, Torben Pastore, Briana Rodriguez, William A Yost, Jungmee Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous relative cue reliance in speech-on-speech masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert A LutfiAuditory Behavioral Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA.
Torben PastoreSpatial Hearing Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA.
Briana RodriguezAuditory Behavioral Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA.
William A YostSpatial Hearing Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA.
Jungmee LeeAuditory Behavioral Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA.

Funding

The Information in Auditory PatternsR01DC001262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LUTFI, ROBERT A · 1991 to 2023
$6.3M
Dynamic Sound Source LocalizationR01DC015214 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI YOST, WILLIAM ALBERT · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001262NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A molecular (trial-by-trial) analysis of data from a cocktail-party, target-talker search task was used to test two general classes of explanations accounting for individual differences in listener performance: cue weighting models for which errors are tied to the speech features talkers have in common with the target and internal noise models for which errors are largely independent of these features. The speech of eight different talkers was played simultaneously over eight different loudspeakers surrounding the listener. The locations of the eight talkers varied at random from trial to trial. The listener's task was to identify the location of a target talker with which they had previously been familiarized. An analysis of the response counts to individual talkers showed predominant confusion with one talker sharing the same fundamental frequency and timbre as the target and, secondarily, other talkers sharing the same timbre. The confusions occurred for a roughly constant 31% of all of the trials for all of the listeners. The remaining errors were uniformly distributed across the remaining talkers and responsible for the large individual differences in performances observed. The results are consistent with a model in which largely stimulus-independent factors (internal noise) are responsible for the wide variation in performance across listeners.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionIndividualityNoiseSpeech

Identifiers

PMID36182280
PMCPMC9507302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.