Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181716›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care.

Huayi Huang, Harry H X Wang, Eddie Donaghy, David Henderson, Stewart W Mercer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Huayi HuangUsher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry H X WangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Sheng, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-6527
Eddie DonaghyUsher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David HendersonUsher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stewart W MercerUsher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1703-3664
Centre for Global Health Research · CASun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimorbidity (the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions within an individual) is a complex management challenge, with a very limited evidence base. Theories can help in the design and operationalization of complex interventions.

objectiveThis article proposes self-determination theory (SDT) as a candidate theory for the development and evaluation of interventions in multimorbidity.

methodsWe provide an overview of SDT, its use in research to date, and its potential utility in complex interventions for patients with multimorbidity based on the new MRC framework.

resultsSDT-based interventions have mainly focused on health behaviour change in the primary prevention of disease, with limited use in primary care and chronic conditions management. However, SDT may be a useful candidate theory in informing complex intervention development and evaluation, both in randomized controlled trials and in evaluations of 'natural experiments'. We illustrate how it could be used multimorbidity interventions in primary care by drawing on the example of CARE Plus (a primary care-based complex intervention for patients with multimorbidity in deprived areas of Scotland).

conclusionsSDT may have utility in both the design and evaluation of complex interventions for multimorbidity. Further research is required to establish its usefulness, and limitations, compared with other candidate theories. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our funded research programme, of which this paper is an early output, has a newly embedded patient and public involvement group of four members with lived experience of long-term conditions and/or of being informal carers. They read and commented on the draft manuscript and made useful suggestions on the text. They will be fully involved at all stages in the rest of the programme of research.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPersonal AutonomyChronic DiseaseHumansPrimary Health CareScotlandmotivationpersonal autonomyprimary careprofessional autonomyself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID36181716
PMCPMC9700158
OpenAlexW4298616292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.